sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:11:02 -0500
On 09/18/2014 12:48 AM, Thomas Orgis wrote:
<snip>
>
> That might be a point: Who is paying the SMGL server at the moment?
> What kind of setup is it (redundancy, service, blah)? I admit that the
> mirroring system is the last straw that keeps me from jumping off
> sourceforge for a project of mine ... I am a bit afraid that my own
> server could go down and service be broken. But then, my old server
> went for many years without issue, and it wasn't even any kind of proper
> server hardware.
Jeremy Blosser is paying for it out of pocket. It's an old box, and it
doesn't have a whole lot of horsepower. Moving off of those boxes would
save him actual dollars every month. Moving to github would give us
additional redundancy, since it'd basically be a "cloud."
<snip>
> Or, is there currently pressing need to get out of the hosting we have?
Ultimately, it'd still be git, just from
git AT github.com/sourcemage/grimoire.git instead of
scm.sourcemage.org/grimoire.git
That's probably the only substantial difference, not counting a provided
issue tracking thing, instead of self-hosted chiliproject (which isn't
as good, but is stupid easy to maintain)
--
David
>
>
> Alrighty then,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
David Kowis, 09/17/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Paul Vinogradov, 09/17/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
Ismael Luceno, 09/17/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
David Kowis, 09/18/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Ismael Luceno, 09/18/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
David Kowis, 09/18/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
Thomas Orgis, 09/18/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
David Kowis, 09/18/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Jeremy Blosser, 09/18/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Jeremy Blosser, 09/18/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
David Kowis, 09/18/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Treeve Jelbert, 09/18/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Jeremy Blosser, 09/18/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Sukneet Basuta, 09/19/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
Remko van der Vossen, 09/24/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, David Kowis, 09/24/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Jeremy Blosser, 09/27/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?,
David Kowis, 09/24/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Github as primary source repository for SourceMage?, Remko van der Vossen, 09/24/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.