sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:09:04 -0500
On 08/17/2012 08:15 AM, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> FYI:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html
> (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case you
> haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we can drop
> that support entirely.)
>
> [arch-dev-public] Migration to systemd
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-August/023389.html
>
So this discussion as it currently stands, is that we don't want to
change anything about the way we ship SMGL, or migrate away away from
simpleinit-msb, to a different default.
And that we should support all init systems.
I don't really see us changing anything from what we're doing right now.
Am I correct in reading this discussion that way?
--
David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/17/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, David Kowis, 08/17/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, Jaka Kranjc, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Vlad Glagolev, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
flux, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Vlad Glagolev, 08/17/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, flux, 08/18/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Sukneet Basuta, 08/18/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, Arjan Bouter, 08/20/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Vlad Glagolev, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
flux, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
David Kowis, 08/21/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, flux, 08/21/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.