sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:45:34 +0200
On Friday 17 of August 2012 15:15:33 Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> FYI:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html
> (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case you
> haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we can drop
> that support entirely.)
Isn't it a different set of developers? As far as I understood, they only
joined the sources since there's a lot of code share. Statements from one
head
about the other thus seem much less relevant or worrysome.
LP
--
To err is humor
-
[SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/17/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, David Kowis, 08/17/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, Jaka Kranjc, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Vlad Glagolev, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
flux, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Vlad Glagolev, 08/17/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, flux, 08/18/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Sukneet Basuta, 08/18/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, Arjan Bouter, 08/20/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
Vlad Glagolev, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
flux, 08/17/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd,
David Kowis, 08/21/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev & systemd, flux, 08/21/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.