Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Bor Kraljič <pyrobor AT ver.si>]

On 12. of Oct 2011 20:03:14 Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net> wrote:
> I haven't been looking at it as I generally don't run KDE or very many
> QT programs.  But I don't think it should have been removed.  We don't
> remove gtk+ or gtk+2 just because gtk+3 is out.  The only way it should
> have been removed is if it was verified that all the spells that just
> depend on qt-x11 work with the qt4 compatibility.
Feel free to do the work... I have just tested few of the spells that I 
removed optional dependency on qt-x11... NONE of them compiled... (few random 
spells don't know which). But my point is that we have more than enough 
spells 
that don't download, verifiy sources, compile even without those I removed. 

If I you plan to update some spell to use qt4... Feel free to revert my 
commit.
> 
> CuZnDragon
> Robin Cook
> 
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 02:38 +0200, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > > I plan to pull the branch into test in next few days.
> > 
> > We discussed on irc, just mention also here.
> > In this sentence the "next few days" meant almost immediately.
> > It isn't a problem. Problem is that nobody really care, nobody discuss,
> > nobody review commits. This thread was discussed only by Bor alone.
> > 
> > Of course we have no time. Source Mage isn't our full time job. But we
> > have to discuss. If mailing lists don't work we need regular irc
> > meetings with logs on our web site, we need some regular voting with
> > just +1 or -1. Some of our irc channel should be published so all can
> > see the reasons of some activity.
> > 
> > BTW, the subject of this thread is "kde3 removal from grimoire". But not
> > only kde3 spells have been removed. The spell qt-x11 was also removed
> > together with all spells depended on qt-x11. How many developers have
> > agreed with this?