Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>]

I haven't been looking at it as I generally don't run KDE or very many
QT programs.  But I don't think it should have been removed.  We don't
remove gtk+ or gtk+2 just because gtk+3 is out.  The only way it should
have been removed is if it was verified that all the spells that just
depend on qt-x11 work with the qt4 compatibility.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 02:38 +0200, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > I plan to pull the branch into test in next few days. 
> 
> 
> We discussed on irc, just mention also here.
> In this sentence the "next few days" meant almost immediately.
> It isn't a problem. Problem is that nobody really care, nobody discuss,
> nobody review commits. This thread was discussed only by Bor alone.
> 
> Of course we have no time. Source Mage isn't our full time job. But we
> have to discuss. If mailing lists don't work we need regular irc
> meetings with logs on our web site, we need some regular voting with
> just +1 or -1. Some of our irc channel should be published so all can
> see the reasons of some activity.
> 
> BTW, the subject of this thread is "kde3 removal from grimoire". But not
> only kde3 spells have been removed. The spell qt-x11 was also removed
> together with all spells depended on qt-x11. How many developers have
> agreed with this?
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part