sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:48:00 +0100
On Friday 13 of March 2009 08:14:11 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> So it has come up in sourcemage-admin and SM-admin as well[0] that we
> are going to be becoming a non-profit 501c3 eventually.
> Now the question is...
>
> Do we go through all the machinations ourselves(adding overhead to the
> PL and so on) or do we use the resources of the Software Freedom
> Conservancy[1] project.
>
> My own opinion is that we should go with the conservancy. They have a
> list of member projects among them: Samba, Wine, Boost to name a few.
The wine experience wasn't the best, as things took ages (you can read about
this in older WWNs). But it sounds good to me - why burden ourselves when we
can burden someone else?
It is also an opportunity to unify our copyrights (if so we desire).
LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/13/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not,
flux, 03/13/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not, Jaka Kranjc, 03/13/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not, Jaka Kranjc, 03/13/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not, Jeremy Blosser, 03/13/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not,
flux, 03/13/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.