sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:39:17 +0100
On Friday 13 of March 2009 11:05:27 flux wrote:
> There is one thing that makes me suspicious:
>
> "The Conservancy does not currently charge its member projects any
> fees."
>
> It sounds like they are reserving the right to charge fees later, once
> they get enough member projects that they aren't worried about
> disappearing, for "administrative costs" (non-profit, but profit, if you
> follow :-P). Sure I'm probably being paranoid and conspiracy theorist,
> but if they didn't want to keep that as an option why mention
> "currently"?
"... on behalf of its members, who are, of course, always free to join and
leave the Conservancy at any time."
Is that profit-nonprofit idea legally possible at all?
LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/13/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not,
flux, 03/13/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not, Jaka Kranjc, 03/13/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not, Jaka Kranjc, 03/13/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not, Jeremy Blosser, 03/13/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Non-profit org or not,
flux, 03/13/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.