sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?

From: Remko van der Vossen <wich AT yuugen.jp>
To: Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT sourcemage.org>
Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:57:37 +0100

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:50:48AM +0300, Vlad Glagolev wrote:
> why cmake? Why do you add any extra software isn't really needed to build
> other software?!

If someone really cares, I would suggest implementing a build_depends
which checks if the spell is available, if so, proceed, otherwise ask
the admin whether he wishes to retain the dependee after the cast of
the depender. Simple, should be straightforward to implement and
everyone can have what they want.

Remko van der Vossen.

Attachment: pgpxVc8__RBHx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, Vlad Glagolev, 12/18/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, Thomas Orgis, 12/18/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, David Kowis, 12/18/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, Ivan Lezhnjov Jr., 12/19/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, Remko van der Vossen, 12/19/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, Ladislav Hagara, 12/19/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Why cmake?, lynx, 12/19/2008