Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT sourcemage.org>]

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:18:27 -0500
David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:

> 
> Therefore, it shouldn't be reverted. Already we're evidencing that it 
> doesn't affect anyone (Yet, I'll concede) but you. There's two people 
> that don't have the problem, and one that does.

lol, of course! Cause i reverted it too fast, as i said before -- i just 
prevented the trouble
for the smgl users.

> 
> Simple majority would say that it shouldn't be reverted.
> 

lol

> The argument that it's "not a gcc/glibc bug" is that it doesn't affect 
> the building of a system. Gcc/glibc are necessary to be working in a 
> fully functional manner so that you can continue to build your system. 
> They're part of our basesystem, and thus subject to more stringent 
> requirements. gtk+2 isn't.

oic

> 
> There were also two patches within that thread you referenced, but you 
> only mentioned applying one of them.
> 
> That's randrproto-1.3.patch:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/30661
> 
> And another:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/30801
> 
> Which patch did you apply?

the second, the first is for API changes that gnome guys need to know about

> And it appears that the patches would apply 
> to xrandr, not xorg-server...

rofl :), xorg-server-1.4.2/randr/rrptoperty.c

-- 
Dont wait to die to find paradise...
--
Cheerz,
Vlad "Enqlave" Glagolev

Attachment: pgpnB2hz3EZcv.pgp
Description: PGP signature