Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions to the nominees

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions to the nominees
  • Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:41:43 -0600

On Mar 08, David Kowis [dkowis AT shlrm.org] wrote:
> Andrew Stitt wrote:
>
> >
> > Im not really sure theres much point in continuing to serve and volley
> > excuses about this though. The ball got dropped, and that sucks. More
> > leadership and accountability was needed. I think Jeremy understands this
> > and will do what he can as PL. However that doesnt mean it should all be
> > on him. The grimoire is too big of a component to run on auto-pilot. So,
> > I will be looking for the ability to lead and ensure that "things get
> > done"
> > when making my voting decision.
> >
>
> Here, here!
>
> That's very much what I'm looking for here as well. Someone to make
> decisions, push people. Decide on what we're going to do and make it
> happen. I'm not saying they should do it all themselves, but if the
> right people aren't working on the high priority tasks, then I expect
> them to either bother those people, or it's not a high priority task
> anymore.

Yeah... a lot of the questions being asked of the candidates are
high-profile issues with feelings behind them, so people are understandably
getting sidetracked trying to solve them again now. But we aren't going to
solve all of these during this election. We need to hear what the
candidates intend to do themselves to manage these things to resolution.
More of "what you will do" as opposed to "what the project needs".

Attachment: pgp_kJCAQLNIX.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page