Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions to the nominees

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions to the nominees
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:41:18 +0100

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:31:24PM +0100, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Thursday 08 of March 2007 21:21:38 Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10703
> > >
> > > Like Andrew said, the problem lies in the keyword index not being there.
> >
> > Well, gaze could still have implemented a search functionality without
> > the index being in the official grimoire.
> That's how it was done. ;)
> Why would the sorcery team review the patch or commit that functionality
> though, as it relies on the index being there (unusable without it) and
> genereting it was estamblished to be too expensive to be run on the user
> side
> regularly. Plus, the interest in keywords soon diminished.

Well, there's no reason not to make a function actually using keywords
available to developers, so they can actually *see* why there's a reason
to spend time on keywords.
So, with the current git setup, the obvious answer is: give us a branch
name we can install to test keywords

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page