sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:25:34 +0000
On Sunday 07 January 2007 20:38, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> You forgot to mention udev-old, which has been made just for that. It is
> even newer than the version in the current stable.
Udev-old exists only for cases where the user has a < 2.6.15 kernel and
therefore needs hotplug to autoload modules. It's definitely not meant to be
the default choice. The next stable will have a 2.6.18.1 kernel.
> What about udev force_depending on linux and speculating that both will be
> in the queue? Would that work?
This and the other solutions that depend on linux have the inherent fault
that
we don't want to enforce a linux dependency on users.
--
Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
Attachment:
pgpZTRSZJWrh4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest,
Juuso Alasuutari, 01/07/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest, David Brown, 01/07/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest,
Juuso Alasuutari, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest, Jaka Kranjc, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest, seth, 01/07/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] putting udev vs. hotplug to rest,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.