sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Alexander Tsamutali" <astsmtl AT gmail.com>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:52:09 +0500
IMO that's not fixing the problem, but rather moving it out of site.
We'll still have those bugs, just in grimoire "xyz' rather than the
'main' grimoire. I don't see splitting up the grimoires any further as
being productive, but rather time should be spent on fixing the
current bugs (we've had close to this many bugs before and brought it
down in a short while) rather than finding ways to make our count look
smaller, while still remaining the same.
You are right. If we cannot support all ~5500 spells we should drop
~4500 and concentrate on 1000. IMHO it's better to have stable
grimoire with 1000 spells than to have buggy, unusable grimoire with
5500 spells. Our main goal is to attract more users and developers. If
we give our users possibility to install stable server/workstation
they will stay with us, otherwise they'll leave.
--
Alexander Tsamutali
-
[SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Alexander Tsamutali, 01/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Pol Vinogradov, 01/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
seth, 01/02/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire, Thomas Orgis, 01/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
seth, 01/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Juuso Alasuutari, 01/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Alexander Tsamutali, 01/03/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire, Eric Sandall, 01/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Alexander Tsamutali, 01/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Alexander Tsamutali, 01/03/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire, Andrew, 01/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Juuso Alasuutari, 01/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Buggy grimoire,
Pol Vinogradov, 01/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.