Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:57:59 -0700

David Kowis wrote:
<snip>
> This looks like a safe plan of action. Although you could simply replace
> all this
> (potentially) difficult logic with a warning and query defaulting to n for a
> while. Of course, only display the warning if they've got modules for 1.6
> installed, if that's not to difficult to detect.
>
> Your process seems good. It's the system administrator's job to ensure that
> an
> upgrade won't break their system.
<snip>

While that's true, we are also encouraged to not break packages as we
modify others. ;) The above plan sounds like it should stop breakage,
but it may be annoying as guile will continually be put in the update
queue on a system-update.

Perhaps make a guile1.8 package and have whatever needs it explicitly
depend on it, otherwise depend on GUILE, which guile1.8 and guile may
provide?

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page