sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:15:28 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Eric Sandall wrote:
> David Kowis wrote:
> <snip>
>> This looks like a safe plan of action. Although you could simply replace
>> all this
>> (potentially) difficult logic with a warning and query defaulting to n for
>> a
>> while. Of course, only display the warning if they've got modules for 1.6
>> installed, if that's not to difficult to detect.
>>
>> Your process seems good. It's the system administrator's job to ensure
>> that an
>> upgrade won't break their system.
> <snip>
>
> While that's true, we are also encouraged to not break packages as we
> modify others. ;) The above plan sounds like it should stop breakage,
> but it may be annoying as guile will continually be put in the update
> queue on a system-update.
>
> Perhaps make a guile1.8 package and have whatever needs it explicitly
> depend on it, otherwise depend on GUILE, which guile1.8 and guile may
> provide?
>
I don't think that's a good idea, because then we end up with something
we've got to come back and take care of. Deprecating the old spell. It's
not too hard to be careful with your update lists. just say y when it
asks you. I'm saying this because I don't think we *will* come back and
clean out the old version. The amount of work required to fix a minor
annoyance isn't worth it, IMHO.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=mkd7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
Maurizio Boriani, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8, Maurizio Boriani, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
David Kowis, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
Eric Sandall, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8, David Kowis, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
Eric Sandall, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8, Maurizio Boriani, 10/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8, Jeremy Blosser, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] About guile 1.8,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.