Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
  • Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:48:06 +0200

> Also I can read :
>
> "First rule for allowing such a version choice is that all dependencies
> of the spell need to work with all versions, otherwise the spell should
> be split. (Note: this can probably also be handled using SUB_DEPENDS,
> but that needs further checking before it can get standardised.)"
>
> This is not clear enough for an official document imho. It should use
> SUB_DEPENDS or not and not "perhaps".
>
Afaik sub-depends are not viable here, because we can't handle conflicts. I
think this was demonstrated with mysql4/5.

--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: pgp2rxS4x3SjS.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page