sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Andraž \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:01:29 +0200
David Kowis wrote :
> Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> > Flavien Bridault wrote :
> >
> >> That would be good indeed that we normalize that. Not especially for us,
> >> but above all for the users. It should be less confusing to have only
> >> one convention.
> >
> > We already normalized this:
> > http://wiki.sourcemage.org/Multi_Version_Spells
> > https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2005-August/011906.html
> >
> > I don't really see any use in reopening this topic.
>
> I'm going to note that there's nothing "official" about that doc. It's just
> an
> example. There's no "official" policy thats written down that says that we
> MUST do
> it this way. This is just how you would go about doing it. Just having the
> doc
> doesn't mean that it must be done that way.
>
In case you didn't check the mailing list link it was moved into
official docs pre-server crash.
Mail quote for the lazy:
>> I know you have been busy and I've needed this info for a few spells
>> recently so I went ahead and created a doc. Take a look at it and let
>> me
>> know if it's ok or if it needs changes. I have it set to not published
>> right now so it won't show up to people just browsing the site.
>>
>> http://www.sourcemage.org/spell-multi_version
That link is atm dead since not much was happening in the meantime.
> The use in reopening this topic is, if we do ${SPELL}-cvs it's easier to
> ensure
> dependencies. Subdepends must be used in the other case, and those aren't
> exactly
> simple.
Also it is noted http://wiki.sourcemage.org/Multi_Version_Spells that
where there is need to depend on a -whatever version of the spell
specificaly it's allowed to have a $spell-$version spell.
>From the site:
First rule for allowing such a version choice is that all
dependencies of the spell need to work with all versions, otherwise the
spell should be split.
Examples:
ffmpeg and ffmpeg-svn
automake, automake1.7, automake1.8
jack and jack-cvs
All of these are specific.
> Also, perhaps we should have some official documentation
> repository. The
> wiki is for documents under development. At least, that was the original
> plan. It
> might be wise to have a few grimoire guru's spin through the wiki
> documentation
> and determine what we do and don't do and get it on to the official drupal
> site in
> some organized fashion.
>
> David
>
>
Also note this document was written by Arwed as a standard on how we use
this in response for a need to standardize this.
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.
Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
-
[SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Juuso Alasuutari, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Jaka Kranjc, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Thomas Orgis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Arjan Bouter, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Ladislav Hagara, 10/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andrew, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.