sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:23:36 +0200
Am Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:31:22 +0200
schrieb "Andraž \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>:
> Flavien Bridault wrote :
>
> > That would be good indeed that we normalize that. Not especially for us,
> > but above all for the users. It should be less confusing to have only
> > one convention.
>
> We already normalized this:
> http://wiki.sourcemage.org/Multi_Version_Spells
What I really don't like is that a user cannot know from "gaze versions" what
versions are in a spell.
It shows one of them... but one has to start casting to know if there aren't
others.
That's a big minus for usability that could be worked around by better
integration of multi version spells into sorcery.
But then again, it looks like supporting several versions of one program is
growing to be a normal thing and the statement about one spell - one version
(no complicated "slots" stuff or whatever) gets more and more hollow.
I myself am tempted to add a cvs option to the gnuplot spell since the stable
release is just too aged to be usable to me.
Addition of a gnuplot-cvs spell would be more user-friendly, but not friendly
for spells that depend on gnuplot.
One had to add new provider called GNUPLOT, make all depend on that instead
of gnuplot itself...
So the hack of multiple versions provided by one spell hides the problem from
our dependency system that still can pretend to follow the "one spell - one
version" strategy.
I am unsure if I am pro or con on that... but what I am sure about is that
the user should be know in advance what version options he has for a spell.
I'd like problems solved like what the manual "summon <multi-version-spell>"
should do (imagine summoning on one box for installing on another box that
doesn't have internet, so there isn't even a config from last cast).
One needs means to say "summon this version of <multi-verison-spell>".
So my main point is if we want to settle multi version spells, we should
fully take account of that and support the user in working with them.
Thomas.
Attachment:
pgpMS1JTKrX_F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Juuso Alasuutari, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Jaka Kranjc, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Thomas Orgis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
David Kowis, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Arjan Bouter, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Ladislav Hagara, 10/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andrew, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andrew, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Alexander Tsamutali, 10/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andrew, 10/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Flavien Bridault, 10/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.