sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Flavien Bridault <vlaaad AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:39:16 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Flavien Bridault wrote:
>> So I reformulate. Why ? :-))
>> I mean why would someone want a new Lead Developer ? Is this just a step
>> to be able to become a Project/Component Lead ?
>
Well, lead developers commit more time to the project. They are required
to vote. They help steer the project. One who is a lead developer is
quite involved in the project. As such, they provide the best candidates
for a Component Lead. They've already shown their commitment to the
project, so they're not likely to give up and walk away. They've been
around long enough to acquire Lead Developer status, so they're familiar
with the project and how we do things.
I suppose you could see it as "just a step" but some are quite happy
with just Lead Developer. They don't have any specific responsibilities,
but they enjoy working on and leading the project.
Hope that helps clear it up a bit.
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)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=VywI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Jeremy Blosser, 09/19/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Matthew Clark, 09/19/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Jeremy Blosser, 09/19/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Matthew Clark, 09/19/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Juuso Alasuutari, 09/19/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
David Kowis, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Flavien Bridault, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
David Kowis, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Flavien Bridault, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
David Kowis, 09/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Flavien Bridault, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
David Kowis, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Flavien Bridault, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Andrew Stitt, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Jeremy Blosser, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Juuso Alasuutari, 09/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead, Matthew Clark, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Juuso Alasuutari, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Jeremy Blosser, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
David Kowis, 09/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Component Lead Nominations: Tome Lead,
Flavien Bridault, 09/20/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.