sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:45:40 -0500
On May 21, Andra?? ruskie Levstik [ruskie AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> Eric Sandall wrote :
>
> > >
> > > Web interface is up here:
> > > http://scmweb.sourcemage.org/smgl/grimoire.svk/
> > >
> > > Does anyone know a better svn repo browser than svnweb? This seems
> > > pretty
> > > limited in functionality. And it's not very bright about what it
> > > lists...
> > > if you click on a filename, you get back a list of every file that was
> > > changed in the revision that last changed that file, and then the acual
> > > file contents you asked for. This means that for a lot of these files
> > > that
>
> > > haven't changed since their initial import, you have to wait for a list
> > > of
> > > every file in the repo to load. In other words, it scales about as
> > > well as
>
> > > svn does. Some of these pages are like 4-5MB in size. #svk told me
> > > this
> > > is the one to use though, and it looks like svk uses it themselves
> > > (though
> > > theirs is down right now).
> >
> > I've heard viewcvs can display SVN repos, but not very well. Chora (part
> > of the HORDE framework) can display SVN repos.
>
> There's ViewVC BUT I think you have a mis-configuration problem with
> the svn::web. I had a similar problem with it a while ago.
>
> Look here on how it's supposed to look:
>
> http://mages.ath.cx:9090/viewsvn
>
> The problem is I belive that it can't find the css in the proper location
> but
> am not 100% sure.
It had an issue with some missing plugin for the default 'trac' theme it
tried to use, I switched it to the 'basic' one or whatever in the name of
getting it up for now so I could move on to hg and other stuff. I'm not
really worried about how it looks during the eval.
However, there's definitely a functionality difference on yours... your
links to files don't include the ?rev=<n> arg, compare the links to files
on:
http://mages.ath.cx:9090/viewsvn/index.pl/grimoires/browse/trunk/test/
vs:
http://scmweb.sourcemage.org/smgl/grimoire.svk/browse/stable/0.3/
Any idea if that was something you configured? I kind of doubt that's the
theme, but maybe it is...
Attachment:
pgpc5ybA4qb3f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, seth, 05/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/23/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/23/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/23/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/23/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/23/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Eric Sandall, 05/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jeremy Blosser, 05/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/21/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Eric Sandall, 05/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/20/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.