Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
  • Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:50:00 -0500

On May 20, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> On Apr 12, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> > The current identified SCMs to try are git, svk, and svn. git is most
> > similar to bzr (which the other teams are already using) and has a very
> > robust feature set. svk is most similar to p4. svn is probably in the
> > widest general community use. Is this the right list? Do we have some
> > volunteer gurus/sections for each?
>
> svk is ready. The size requirements are closer to p4, but still higher.

Web interface is up here: http://scmweb.sourcemage.org/smgl/grimoire.svk/

Does anyone know a better svn repo browser than svnweb? This seems pretty
limited in functionality. And it's not very bright about what it lists...
if you click on a filename, you get back a list of every file that was
changed in the revision that last changed that file, and then the acual
file contents you asked for. This means that for a lot of these files that
haven't changed since their initial import, you have to wait for a list of
every file in the repo to load. In other words, it scales about as well as
svn does. Some of these pages are like 4-5MB in size. #svk told me this
is the one to use though, and it looks like svk uses it themselves (though
theirs is down right now).

Attachment: pgpuyZHcPAZsh.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page