Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>]

I have no problem with most of it except having no binding vote in the
issues voting if not a lead developer.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:59 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Apr 17, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> > - there would be a process for the general developer population to veto
> >   anything the leads decided
> 
> Blah, that's not entirely correct.  The proposal identifies a way for the
> general developers to veto all aspects of who is leading things and any
> votes by the leads that would modify how the voting policy and project
> organization itself works.  There's no provision to veto other day-to-day
> issue votes directly, but being able to veto who is doing the voting
> accomplishes the same thing over time.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part