Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization
  • Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:35:46 -0500

I have no problem with most of it except having no binding vote in the
issues voting if not a lead developer.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:59 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Apr 17, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> > - there would be a process for the general developer population to veto
> > anything the leads decided
>
> Blah, that's not entirely correct. The proposal identifies a way for the
> general developers to veto all aspects of who is leading things and any
> votes by the leads that would modify how the voting policy and project
> organization itself works. There's no provision to veto other day-to-day
> issue votes directly, but being able to veto who is doing the voting
> accomplishes the same thing over time.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page