Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Apr 17, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> - there would be a process for the general developer population to veto
>   anything the leads decided

Blah, that's not entirely correct.  The proposal identifies a way for the
general developers to veto all aspects of who is leading things and any
votes by the leads that would modify how the voting policy and project
organization itself works.  There's no provision to veto other day-to-day
issue votes directly, but being able to veto who is doing the voting
accomplishes the same thing over time.

Attachment: pgp4HFlmh3L_i.pgp
Description: PGP signature