sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:28:13 +0100
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:45:29AM -0800, Seth Woolley wrote:
> Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:37:28AM -0800, Seth Woolley wrote:
> >>The vulns fixed were to use a new (more secure) internal zlib version.
> >>If we use the system zlib, we fix the issues and can keep the old
> >>version around. I suggest we remove the option to use the internal zlib
> >>version in the spell, use the system one, and merely downgrade it.
> >
> >
> > If this is indeed the only security fix in there, removing that option
> > won't hurt anyone.
> >
>
> Says so here:
>
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/cvs/ccvs/NEWS?rev=1.341&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
Thanks, I downgraded it and made it always use system zlib.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?, George Sherwood, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
David Brown, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.