sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "George Sherwood" <george AT beernabeer.com>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:51:42 -0500
I agree with you and think we should stick with the stable version. Is
there something in the feature version that we are using in Sourcemage?
Maybe make the spell allow both versions. I will do the work when you let
me know.
George
-----Original Message-----
From: sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Arwed von Merkatz
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:07 AM
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?
Hi,
there have been several reports about current cvs version hanging on
checkouts of various stuff, among other nss and nspr which have been
switched to using snapshots instead of direct cvs checkouts because of
that.
Apparently this is not caused by the cvs server as I thought but by our
version of the client. Downgrading to 1.12.12 or to the stable cvs tree
(1.11.21) fixes this.
Since 1.12.13 was a security update from 1.12.12, we can't just
downgrade, so we can either backport the security fixes from 1.12.13 to
1.12.12 (unless those are causing the problem of course ;) or switch our
spell to use the stable cvs tree. Switching to stable is what I would
prefer, but that will remove some features from our cvs version.
What do you think?
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux
developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?, George Sherwood, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
David Brown, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.