sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Woolley <swoolley AT panasas.com>
- To: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:45:29 -0800
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:37:28AM -0800, Seth Woolley wrote:
The vulns fixed were to use a new (more secure) internal zlib version. If we use the system zlib, we fix the issues and can keep the old version around. I suggest we remove the option to use the internal zlib version in the spell, use the system one, and merely downgrade it.
If this is indeed the only security fix in there, removing that option
won't hurt anyone.
Says so here:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/cvs/ccvs/NEWS?rev=1.341&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
Seth
--
Seth Alan Woolley
Software Engineer
Accelerating Time to Results(TM) with Clustered Storage
www.panasas.com
swoolley AT panasas.com
510-608-4382
-
[SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?, George Sherwood, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
David Brown, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] current cvs version broken?,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.