Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization
  • Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:10:08 +0100

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :

> A possible arrangement based on the above would be something where we keep
> the TLs, but not the teams... make the TLs component leads or something
> instead, or the "council of elders" idea but with a PL still over them.
> Basically, have the majority of developers that work on spells continue to
> do that, then have a tier of more "free agent" types who are working on the
> hairier stuff, then from that group have specific leads identified so we
> continue to have ownership and oversight of the major areas instead of
> anarchy, then a PL over them. This arrangement would be very similar to
> what we have now except it would allow various team members to move more
> freely between projects as they're needed or want to, and would put a bit
> more responsibilty on the leads to make sure their areas were progressing
> toward their goals. I'm mostly making this up as I type it, but it seems
> like it might describe the kind of thing that happens naturally now.
> Acknowledging it and actively supporting it might find us spending less
> time spinning wheels and more time getting things done.
>
>

Hmm that doesn't sound bad

--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html

Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page