Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] PERFORCE change 74345 by Sergey A. Lipnevich for review

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] PERFORCE change 74345 by Sergey A. Lipnevich for review
  • Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:47:05 -0500

David Kowis wrote:
That's not included in the grimoire entry when you run a scribe update...
Perhaps this can be synthesized from relevant portions of update manager's output.
That's the reason for including it in the grimoire changelogs for spell
removals or additions. I've also noticed that Eric's had to mention that
quite often in the p4 commits list. We should have some official
direction on this matter. Perhaps input from the Grimoire Lead? Forgive
me if this is written somewhere...
I looked it up on the wiki before writing the original email, there seems to be no requirements regarding grimoire's ChangeLog file.

Also, on a different subject, but related, I don't particularly like the
layout of that thing. It's difficult to parse. Not mechanically, but for
me mentally. Too much information and not organized in a sane format,
IMHO. But again that's not what this is about, just me venting some steam :)
I seldom read it and never update it unless I'm making serious changes (like spells moving around), mainly because and I didn't find an easy way to script this task and because I think it's mostly irrelevant. I know I'm being selfish here, for which I apologize, but I can't see any value in mentioning every new spell in grimoire's ChangeLog.

Sergey.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page