sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:02:51 -0600
On Jan 14, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> > On Jan 13, Jason Flatt [jflatt AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> >> On Friday 13 January 2006 11:45, Eric Sandall wrote:
> <snip>
> >>> The http://www.sourcemage.org/developers is the official page. I had
> >>> remove the wiki one[1] and made a link to the Drupal one before the
> >>> server went down. I'll go redo that.
> >
> > I don't see a particular reason to remove the wiki one, given the policy
> > that the wiki is a place for everyone to edit things "bleeding edge" and
> > then leads move the finished things to drupal. That assumes most docs
> > exist both places.
>
> Yes, but not all pages (e.g. developer listing) will need a 'work in
> progress', IMO.
Consider that we want to encourage our developers to continue to maintain a
"bio" page like we had on the old wiki, and that most of them have
expressed a preference for working in wiki syntax vs. doing drupal pages or
drupal blogs/etc. If we want to encourage them, we should therefore let
them do their developer bio pages on the wiki, and have those promoted to
the drupal site like anything else -- or just leave them on the wiki, since
that's the developers' site anyway. Having the developer page on the wiki
as an index to those pages makes sense.
> >> The reason the layout is so bad is because each section is setup in a
> >> separate table.
> >
> > It's also because the style sheets set up in drupal right now completely
> > suck. Gratuitous padding, over specified fonts, and the like all over the
> > damn place. Having 3 columns on the page doesn't help either.
>
> Feel free to clean it up, I just used my basic (and I mean /basic/ ;))
> HTML skillz to setup the page.
I'm not criticizing your HTML, the style sheets are separate and I'm pretty
sure from looking at them that no one in this project made them. They're
most likely some kind of drupal defaults or imported theme.
Attachment:
pgpt68yBHcYx7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, Mathieu L., 01/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, Jason Flatt, 01/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, David Kowis, 01/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Eric Sandall, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Eric Sandall, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Jason Flatt, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, Eric Sandall, 01/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, Eric Sandall, 01/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Jason Flatt, 01/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru, Eric Sandall, 01/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Eric Sandall, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New general guru,
Eric Sandall, 01/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.