sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Belxjander Serechai <belxjander_serechai AT yahoo.co.nz>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:37:30 +1300
I agree...
for those users who dont use the spell...
I also advovate changing
"depends linux" from to "optional_depends LINUX"
like how several X spells provide "X" services within sorcery
why not make spells optional when they may be skipped within sorcery
and actually allow for externally made
On Fri, 2005-28-10 at 11:55 -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> <snip>
> > However it's done, we could use something like this. It would make things
> > like xen easier to deal with. It would also help with the spells that
> > build kernel modules... we've been changing those to use sorcery functions
> > to find the last built version of the kernel to figure out what tree to
> > build against. I know it has fallback if the linux spell isn't there, but
> > if someone has left the linux spell installed and just done their own
> > kernels past that I imagine it gets confused. It would be nice if those
> > advanced/custom kernels could still get themselves "registered" with
> > sorcery.
>
> IMO, if the user wants to build the kernel outside of a spell then
> they need to not use the linux spell at all (or use it for initial
> setup, then remove it so it is no longer registered.
>
> As David mentioned, the linux spell is there for convenience and it is
> not meant (nor should it) to do everything.
>
> - -sandalle
>
> - --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDYnQUHXt9dKjv3WERAiE0AJ4sCyhzr9NulHVJSmUwj9bvNCaSYQCeLrlQ
> 9yhgFuTS0JRbuqY4Z/JVSxM=
> =wL4Q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Belxjander Serechai, 11/08/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/08/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Eric Sandall, 11/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
David Brown, 11/10/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues, Eric Sandall, 11/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
David Brown, 11/10/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues, David Brown, 11/08/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Belxjander Serechai, 11/08/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/08/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
David Brown, 11/09/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
David Brown, 11/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Spell Custom Kernel Issues,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/08/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.