sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:11:35 -0700
Why don't we fully-describe dependencies such that dependency ordering
is complete enough not to cause improper spell ordering during an upgrade?
I replied to your blog, but talking it over with Andrew made me realize
the problem was probably caused initially by underspecified dependencies
which caused our full-tree dependency analysis to be incomplete, thus
wrong, thus leading to upgrade breakage.
What actually cast too soon (or too late) on your system for the double
upgrades to not work?
Can you send a portion of the activity log to a bug report and cc me on
it?
Seth
P.S. Allowing a trigger to rebuild a spell using the tablet version of
the spell might be another workaround I don't think I mentioned in the
blog, preventing the double-upgrade issue, but again, we need to fix the
problem before adding a patch that doesn't really fix the core problem.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:03:16PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I can't test anything but here's an idea. What if we create a
> `openssl-0.9.7-so'
> spell that *only* installs libcrypto-0.9.7.so and libssl-0.9.7.so? We can
> make
> it an optional dependency of OpenSSL spell until next ISO release for
> example.
> This way, old spells may (testing required) remain functional until they're
> recast, while all new and recast spells would use OpenSSL 0.9.8 includes and
> so-s and will not need 0.9.7 so-s. A dirty hack of course, but it may work.
>
> Sergey.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
Secretary Pacific Green Party of Oregon http://www.pacificgreens.org
Key id FDCEE733 = 5302 B414 64C4 6112 3454 E082 99F0 69DC FDCE E733
Attachment:
pgpPGCG_hGjLN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.