sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt
- From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:09:37 +0200
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Andrew wrote:
> > The only thing i can think of is distrowatch gets their info from
> > listing.txt and including the other grimoires somehow was percieved to
> > cause problem or something...or maybe only the html generation was updated
> > when the two grimoires were branched.
>
> AFAIK only the latter reason makes sense to me. I'd say it's safe to
> (re-)add the games and z-rejected to listings.txt.
>
Would be nicer to have them as separate .txt files
--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
http://ruskie.dtdm.org/blog/
-
[SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt,
Adam Clark, 07/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt,
Andrew, 07/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt,
Eric Sandall, 07/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 07/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Ladislav Hagara, 07/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt,
Eric Sandall, 07/20/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Jason Flatt, 07/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt,
Andrew, 07/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.