sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt

From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
To: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
Cc: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>, sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:22:50 -0700 (PDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Andrew wrote:

The only thing i can think of is distrowatch gets their info from
listing.txt and including the other grimoires somehow was percieved to
cause problem or something...or maybe only the html generation was updated
when the two grimoires were branched.

AFAIK only the latter reason makes sense to me. I'd say it's safe to
(re-)add the games and z-rejected to listings.txt.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC3wb8HXt9dKjv3WERAosmAJ9ndPiQuNZ1MrmrkBsyJcTrWXZyJgCggHyH
bmzs+nH5q34BlU7SkVfdX0w=
=yKi9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Adam Clark, 07/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Andrew, 07/20/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Eric Sandall, 07/20/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 07/21/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Ladislav Hagara, 07/21/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] codex listing.html vs. listing.txt, Jason Flatt, 07/21/2005