Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi <invisible AT hidden-city.net>]

Hi all,

after reading simpleinit docs/examples, talking with some of you on the 
IRC today, and after I browsed a few hours on the web about the need for 
the new Linux init process, I can conclude that I was probably wrong.

Most of the not-so-well-known distributions are striving to create the 
boot process shorter, and the init scripts more manageable.

Simpleinit is but one of those projects, and although I don't like the 
way it is done, if is better than sysvinit I was for.

The problem may lay in the following facts:

- my install process didn't run very well, and all scripts in 
/etc/init.d/runlevels/%[123] were not enabled.

- reasons for creating simpleinit were written in a angry and ugly way

- simpleinit is abandoned in favor of LFSinit

- I don't like the script which runs the service and it's "needs" to be 
in the same file, but this is the practical approach, I know...

bye,
N::

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature