Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - RE: [SM-Discuss] Kernel Module Spells: information and questions

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [SM-Discuss] Kernel Module Spells: information and questions
  • Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:21:09 -0400

Very cool! I for one will be thankful if you make ndiswrapper spell work like
that!

Sergey.

-----Original Message-----
>From: "David Michael Leo Brown Jr."<dmlb2000 AT excite.com>
>Sent: 6/10/05 7:29:29 PM
>To: "sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org"<sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
>Subject: [SM-Discuss] Kernel Module Spells: information and questions
>
>
>Okay got several things to talk about all circling around the same topic:
>
>1) Kernel Module Spells
>
> Hopefully over the next few weeks I'll be going thru the kernels,
mobile,
>and z-rejected sections looking for spells that have triggers against the
linux
>spell and don't use the version of the kernel given by sorcery. This is
one of
>the complaints that I've seen too many times, "Why do I have to recompile
the
>triggers after I've compiled the new kernel and after I then boot to the
new
>kernel."
>
> Also I'll be moving stuff around as well, because if I'm not
mistaken, all
>spells that create kernel modules should go into the kernels section.
Unless the
>spell happens to be z-rejected, in which case it would go to the
z-rejected
>z-kernels section. Currently many spells in the mobile section create
kernel
>modules and should be moved to the kernels section. The alsa-driver spell
will
>also be moved in this case.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page