Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Geoffrey Derber <gderber AT sourcemage.org>]

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:19 -0400, Paul Mahon wrote:
> Having the maintainers as section names might be a bad idea,
> particularly if you're hopeing this will result in many smaller sections
> maintained by more people. More people will cause a higher turnover (in
> numbers, not %), so spells will have to migrate from dir to dir more
> often. I'm not sure how the table feels about spells migrating sections.
> 

<snip>

I am also hesitant on having maintainers as sections.  It would be very
easy that there are some spells that no one would be interested in
maintaining and would never be updated.  I also agree with Paul on the
above reasons.

-- 
Geoffrey Derber
General Guru
<gderber AT sourcemage.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part