Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] alternative grimoire layout

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Geoffrey Derber <gderber AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] alternative grimoire layout
  • Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:08:41 -0400

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:19 -0400, Paul Mahon wrote:
> Having the maintainers as section names might be a bad idea,
> particularly if you're hopeing this will result in many smaller sections
> maintained by more people. More people will cause a higher turnover (in
> numbers, not %), so spells will have to migrate from dir to dir more
> often. I'm not sure how the table feels about spells migrating sections.
>

<snip>

I am also hesitant on having maintainers as sections. It would be very
easy that there are some spells that no one would be interested in
maintaining and would never be updated. I also agree with Paul on the
above reasons.

--
Geoffrey Derber
General Guru
<gderber AT sourcemage.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page