Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] suggestion for the udev spell

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] suggestion for the udev spell
  • Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:41:48 -0800

Quoting Flavien Bridault <flavien.bridault AT free.fr>:
<snip>
> Well I like this idea as I told you ;-)
>
> But I think you mean this way we should deprecate /etc/udev/udev.rules
> and split it between multiple files in /etc/udev/rules.d ? I'm ok with
> this but we must decide how we will split it. Per device type ? I think
> we should think first about all the spells that might need to change
> udev rules. We will have then a better idea of what to do.

I like the idea of keeping the "standard" (to us, at least)
/etc/udev/udev.conf
file and have our spells put their necessary modifications (optionally, of
course ;)) in /etc/udev/{udev.d or rules.d}/.

If we do it per device we'd have a lot of small files there which may get
annoying (though most users would never have to know/modify them anyways).

> So, for my part, as you said, cdrom devices should go in a dedicate
> file, maybe /etc/udev/rules.d/cdroms ?

That, or spellname. e.g. /etc/udev/rules.d/cdrtools.

Which would we prefer?

> Any others ?

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page