Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Feature request for comments?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Feature request for comments?
  • Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:31:11 -0500

We could add a section called 'Software Reviews' where people can write
up their thoughts and ratings on programs. The forums would be a good
place to do this sort of thing.

Oh, and for children, you can't beat Tux Racer :)

On Thu, 2005-10-02 at 14:14 +0100, Pieter Lenaerts wrote:
> I agree with mathieu on the fact that the grimoires are not the way to do
> this.
>
> the forums are aimed at communication, so that's the spot imo
> results from these discussions can be put on the wiki as mathieu proposes,
> since the wiki is supposed to be more of a knowledge base than to be used
> as a discussion forum.
>
> pieter
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:15:40 +0100
> "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 05:54:05AM -0700, Cory S wrote:
> > > Hi guys. I've been thinking about this for a while and thought I
> would
> > > bring it up on the list to see what people think.
> > >
> > > As I've looked for games to install on my machine for my son to
> play,
> > > it's been a little difficult to determine what the best games
> are. At
> > > last count there are 258 games in the grimoire, and it's a little
> > > tough to visit each game's web site to look at screenshots, etc.
> to
> > > figure out what the best ones are. Also, frequently on #sourcemage
> > > someone asks "what do you guys think of exim?" or "has anyone used
> > > proftp?", and it would be nice to have a built-in way for them to
> see
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I thought it would be handy to have some kind of rating
> system
> > > that could maybe be stored in the DETAILS file and be contributed
> by
> > > users/gurus/spell maintainers. That way users would know what the
> > > general consensus is on any given spell. I guess that a command
> would
> > > have to be added to 'gaze' to be able to see it easily, and I'm
> still
> > > not sure how users could submit their ratings, but I think it
> would be
> > > helpful to have functionality like that.
> > >
> > > I also think it could really set our distro apart as it grows and
> more
> > > people start using it.
> > >
> > > So if you think that's the dumbest idea you've ever heard, feel
> free
> > > to shoot holes in it and flame me into oblivion :).
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > I dunno, it seems to me that the grimoire is not at all the right
> place
> > for a rating system. As a part of the packaging system, I don't
> think
> > there should be in there any trace of opinions or partiality, just
> my
> > feeling.
> > However I like the general idea, so maybe a wiki page with a
> permanent
> > polling system could do the trick. Each user/dev could vote once for
> > each soft with an auth system of some kind (gpg?).
> > Eventually, gaze could be taught to use a bot to go through the
> page and
> > quickly give the result to a user who doesn't feel like browsing the
> > wiki page.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mathieu.
> >
> > --
> > We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
> > Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page