sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
FHS 2.3 (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available)
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: FHS 2.3 (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available)
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:36:26 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Eric Sandall wrote:
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5645 is the FHS layout for
the ISO bug.
According to the bug we (and apparently other distros) aren't quite on
the FHS 2.3 bandwagon yet.
Having said that, I've grown accustomed to the /media folder on my
machine. ;)
On this note I've brought up our old threads about this:
Here is a poll started by Arwed von Merkatz:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2003-November/004795.html
Here is the summary of the poll provided by Arwed von Merkatz:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2003-November/004829.html
Here is a request by Ladislav Hagara to have our next ISO FHS 2.3
complaint and Eric Schabell saying that, since it's a standard, we
should follow it:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2004-February/005276.html
Summary of the posts: The majority decided against FHS and Arwed sent
that on to the FHS group, but they went ahead and made their layout a
"standard". It was then decided that, as it's now an official
standard, we should follow it.
Personally, I'd like us to follow the standards, even if we think
they're silly (you can always do `rmdir /media /srv` after an
install), but then we also have to target our audience, whom said no
to FHS 2.3.
Thoughts?
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/27/2005
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/27/2005
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available,
neuron, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available, Frank Switalski, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available, Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available,
Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available, Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available,
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
-
FHS 2.3 (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available),
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
-
Re: FHS 2.3 (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available),
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/27/2005
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3,
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3, Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3, Jeremy Kolb, 01/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3, Andrew, 01/27/2005
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: FHS 2.3,
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
-
Re: FHS 2.3 (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available),
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/27/2005
-
FHS 2.3 (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available),
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86_64 test ISO available, Mathieu L., 01/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.