sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies"
- From: Jackson Alley <jalley AT toomanymirrors.homelinux.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies"
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:53:50 -0400
On Tue, 18 May 2004 16:41:42 +0000
"Mathieu L" <lejatorn AT linuxmail.org> wrote:
>
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > We should probably discuss possible solutions to Bug #5957[0]. ;)
> > >
> > > -sandalle
> > >
> > > [0] http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5957
> >
> > 1. indirect dependencies should be relied on, otherwise every single
> > gnome program would have a list of 30+ dependencies, which just isn't
> > manageable. (I thought we agreed on that before, otherwise we're
> > missing about a thousand dependencies on X11-LIBS ;)
> > 2. having dispel refuse to dispel spells that others depend on sounds
> > like a good solution, with a switch --force to override that
> > behaviour
> >
> > --
> > Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux
> > developer
> >
> > http://www.sourcemage.org
> >
> In the same kind of idea is it planned (is it at least feasable?) to do
> something like:
> I want to cast X.
> Y is also casted because X depends on Y.
> I don't want X anymore so I dispell it.
> -->dispel offers me to dispell Y as well because it's no longer needed by
> any spell.
>
> I would find this useful because it often happens that I cast something
> which depends on a lot of other stuff just to see if I like it; but I
> usually dispel it afterwards and since I don't want my system to be bloated
> by lots of unused stuff, I have to dispell one by one all the previous
> dependencies.
>
> /Lejatorn.
> ------------------------------------------------
> We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
> Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> ______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
>
> Powered by Outblaze
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
In order for dispel to really be able to do something like that we will need
the full DEPENDS tree, which, to the best of my knoladge is incomplete. If
some one is working on this correct me and I'd love to see where it's at.
Thoughts? Ideas? Corrections?
jackson
-----------
========================================================================
Jackson Alley (TooManyMirrors) <jalley AT toomanymirrors.homelinux.com>
GPG EA6C442A233C3611 49FB A47D 9245 AF82 88BE FF57 EA6C 442A 233C 3611
SourceMage GNU/Linux Guru www.sourcemage.org
========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpFoUCiNsqXe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Mathieu L, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Andrew, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Jason Flatt, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies", Jason Flatt, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Jason Flatt, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Jackson Alley, 05/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies", Jose Bernardo Silva, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Andrew, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Ladislav Hagara, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies", Seth Alan Woolley, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Ladislav Hagara, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies", Casey Harkins, 05/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies", Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Andrew, 05/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.