sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:45:58 -0700
Quoting Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>:
> this is proving difficult.
>
> I am able to build just the c++ libraries, but if I ask for just the g++
> compiler, it insists on rebuilding and installing a gcc compiler as well.
> This means that several spells install gcc, which is not good news.
>
> Maybe the gcc spell could archive the bld dirsctory so that it could be
> reused
> by any related spells, and don't cache the installed gcc?
>
> Or is the whole thing getting too complicated?
>
> If you like, I could submit the gcc-g++ spell that I have so far as WIP, so
> that someone else could think about it.
>
> Once this spell is ok, the others should be fairly straightforward.
If it's too difficult/hack-needed to separate the C and C++
compiler/libraries,
then I won't be too upset if they're combined into one spell (perhaps just
"gcc", or should that be a meta-spell for all the compilers? I like that
idea...). Anyone else have a problem with having gcc-c (or gcc-cpp or
gcc-c++?)
providing both C and C++? Most of our packages use C or C++ so there's not
much
reason in separating them, right? Other than to be "clean". ;)
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Treeve Jelbert, 04/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split, Andrew, 04/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Eric Sandall, 04/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Jason Flatt, 04/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Eric Sandall, 04/21/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split,
Treeve Jelbert, 04/21/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split,
Treeve Jelbert, 04/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split,
Eric Sandall, 04/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split, Seth Alan Woolley, 04/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split, Andrew, 04/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split, Casey Harkins, 04/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split,
Eric Sandall, 04/22/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split,
Treeve Jelbert, 04/22/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: gcc split,
Treeve Jelbert, 04/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Eric Sandall, 04/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Jason Flatt, 04/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/20/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.