sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:04:36 -0400
Sorcery used to be a spell as well, but that had problems. I don't
recall what they were... zero might remember, I think he took care of
most of it. It may be that the changes since then will have made sorcery
as a spell more maintainable. If so, then we'd get tracking for free.
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 12:43, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> > No spell uses these functions in any grimoire, it was caused by files
> > left over from a previous install of devel sorcery (libcast). Sorcery
> > should really clean up before installing a new version of itself.
>
> I thought it did that already? Hrmm....it'd be easy to do so if Sorcery
> tracked
> it's files, if that's possible.
>
> -sandalle
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Schabell, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Andrew, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Paul, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Andrew, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Andrew, 04/16/2004
- [SM-Discuss] Re: persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Treeve Jelbert, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Andrew, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Paul, 04/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Andrew, 04/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.