sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:57:50 -0700
Quoting Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>:
> I have noticed that the current stable grimoire has been updated with
> all kinds of spells attempting to use the DEVEL sorcery function
> 'persistent_save', failing them all...
>
> erics
Does anyone have a list of the offending spells so we can revert the changes
to
only devel (I haven't seen any that exhibit this behaviour yet)? Also,
grimoire
gurus need to be careful not to use devel Sorcery functions in their packages.
;)
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Schabell, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Andrew, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Paul, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Andrew, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Andrew, 04/16/2004
- [SM-Discuss] Re: persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Treeve Jelbert, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Andrew, 04/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?, VladimĂr Marek, 04/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] persistent_save function being used in stable spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.