Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2
  • Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:46:33 +1100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:28, Hamish Greig wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:36, -={|TooManyMirrors|}=- wrote:
> > Well a SMGL user informed me that our rep-gtk pkg was at 0.15 while the
> > latest is 0.18 and some other spell apparently requires >= 0.17
> > fixing that was np but then i noticed we also have a rep-gtk2 spell but
> > it seems to be the exact same package at version 0.17.
> > I filed this bug report:
> > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419
> > but I'm not sure if these are now the same spell.
> > toomanymirrors
>
> rep-gtk is for gnome1/gtk+ (sawfish and gnome-karubik-profile)
> rep-gtk2 is for gnome2/gtk+2 (sawfish2 etc)
> grep -r rep-gtk /var/lib/sorcery/codex/$grimoire will show you which spells
> depend on it and if it is the gtk or gtk2 version.
>

oh, in case I need to emphasise the point, sawfish is now broken in whatever
grimoire you changed the rep-gtk version (I know this because It has already
been done once already, even listed in rep-gtk/HISTORY)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAX4jp8fSufZR6424RAu9KAJ4hLcDcl5/+0ypmteoIp1sjcFIH5ACgjHDJ
0Yey0LhFph1U/ChwRlhoJK8=
=f5Mo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page