sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2
- From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: jason AT flattfamily.com
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:14:42 -0500
Hm... that gives me an idea. When this happens will the user be
notified that they have these spells installed that are no longer in the
grimoire? I've been bitten by this a few times (spell name changes or
removals). It would be nice if on an update we were prompted with
obsolete spells and that they've either been removed or renamed and an
option to handle them.
Jeremy
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 21:08, Jason Flatt wrote:
> There is work going on (slow and steady) to remove the GNOME1/GTK+ spells
> in
> favor of the GNOME2/GTK+2 spells, where possible. Once that is complete, a
> lot of this sort of confusion should go away.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
-={|TooManyMirrors|}=-, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jason Flatt, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Paul, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Robin Cook, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.