sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: -={|TooManyMirrors|}=- <jalley AT toomanymirrors.homelinux.com>
- To: SMGL-Discuss List <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:36:19 -0500
Well a SMGL user informed me that our rep-gtk pkg was at 0.15 while the
latest is 0.18 and some other spell apparently requires >= 0.17
fixing that was np but then i noticed we also have a rep-gtk2 spell but
it seems to be the exact same package at version 0.17.
I filed this bug report:
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419
but I'm not sure if these are now the same spell.
toomanymirrors
--
========================================================================
Jackson Alley (TooManyMirrors) <jalley AT toomanymirrors.homelinux.com>
GPG EA6C442A233C3611 49FB A47D 9245 AF82 88BE FF57 EA6C 442A 233C 3611
SourceMage GNU/Linux Guru www.sourcemage.org
========================================================================
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
-={|TooManyMirrors|}=-, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jason Flatt, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Paul, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Robin Cook, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.