sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:28:29 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:36, -={|TooManyMirrors|}=- wrote:
> Well a SMGL user informed me that our rep-gtk pkg was at 0.15 while the
> latest is 0.18 and some other spell apparently requires >= 0.17
> fixing that was np but then i noticed we also have a rep-gtk2 spell but
> it seems to be the exact same package at version 0.17.
> I filed this bug report:
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419
> but I'm not sure if these are now the same spell.
> toomanymirrors
rep-gtk is for gnome1/gtk+ (sawfish and gnome-karubik-profile)
rep-gtk2 is for gnome2/gtk+2 (sawfish2 etc)
grep -r rep-gtk /var/lib/sorcery/codex/$grimoire will show you which spells
depend on it and if it is the gtk or gtk2 version.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAX4St8fSufZR6424RAiguAJ4qXtBgEiO4ihIfDWOMoLO5TuhY9wCeJwQW
2Di8js5v95YIVSgFtgi7hOg=
=6Tp5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
-={|TooManyMirrors|}=-, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jason Flatt, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Paul, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2, Robin Cook, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions on rep-gtk and rep-gtk2,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.