sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Vladimír Marek <vlmarek AT volny.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:00:14 +0100
> Well, 13/34 voted (38%), not enough for even a valid vote, though all of
> them
> voted for Andrew.
>
> What's with the lack of voting guys (for those whom didn't vote)? It's not
> like
> it's hard to hit "Reply" to the mail I sent to you and say "yea" or "nay".
> Shall we retry? Use another method?
Well, I don't know you wery well yet (as you probably don't know me), so
it's hard to give vote to anyone. If my voice has to count anyway, I
will abstain from voting.
--
Neuron
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Schabell, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Chris Dombroski, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Duane Malcolm, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Justin Rocha (Xenith), 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Casey Harkins, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Sandall, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Paul, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Vladimír Marek, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.