sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:48:13 -0500
yea
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 12:48, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Well, 13/34 voted (38%), not enough for even a valid vote, though all of
> them
> voted for Andrew.
>
> What's with the lack of voting guys (for those whom didn't vote)? It's not
> like
> it's hard to hit "Reply" to the mail I sent to you and say "yea" or "nay".
> Shall we retry? Use another method?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -sandalle
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Schabell, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Chris Dombroski, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Duane Malcolm, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Justin Rocha (Xenith), 03/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Casey Harkins, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Eric Sandall, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, Paul, 03/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead voting, VladimĂr Marek, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.