sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:26:00 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
nvidia isn't sysfs aware so the following needs adding to udev.missing
nvidia0:c:195:0:0666:root:root
nvidia1:c:195:1:0666:root:root
nvidia2:c:195:2:0666:root:root
nvidia3:c:195:3:0666:root:root
nvidia4:c:195:4:0666:root:root
nvidia5:c:195:5:0666:root:root
nvidia6:c:195:6:0666:root:root
nvidia7:c:195:7:0666:root:root
nvidiactl:c:195:255:0666:root:root
they are all the same permissions and owners as the NVIDIA_driver Makefile
creates during install.
Udev running well here, thanks Arwed.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:18, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another update on the udev front, things are progressing nicely :)
> Thanks to Hamish and Casey for providing me with a MAKEDEV script.
>
> Changes since last time:
>
> - the init.d spell will check the static /dev for console and null
> devices, if they don't exist it offers to create a static dev tree,
> defaulting to yes (this is only checked if the user chooses udev or
> static for device management)
> - the udev spell now installs a /etc/udev/udev.missing file that gets
> processed by the devices init script to create the devices udev
> doesn't know about, the file is commented and currently contains only
> the ppp device, if anyone finds more missing devices they can be added
> easily.
>
> Still missing is securetty and fstab editing, securetty is easy, fstab
> is hard. For fstab it'll need to map devfs names like
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc -> /dev/hda and vice versa, same
> for scsi. If anyone wants to take a shot at it i'll be happy to include
> it in the init.d spell.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAXr888fSufZR6424RAsO8AJ44P5NXkj/VGb7WvrysW5Y+TvsWuACfQKI8
X+tyYTw4dYfsje7MxBD0oZM=
=AmM8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Bas van Gils, 03/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Robin Cook, 03/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric D. Schabell M.Sc., 03/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Hamish Greig, 03/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/04/2004
- [SM-Discuss] Re: update on udev on /dev status, Treeve Jelbert, 03/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/22/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: update on udev on /dev status,
Treeve Jelbert, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/24/2004
- [SM-Discuss] Re: update on udev on /dev status, Treeve Jelbert, 03/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.